His question is also a pretty good summation of Far Cry as a series, too, with each game upping the ante to try and give you an incredible, adrenaline-pumping experience while also attempting (with mixed success) to make you hold your virtual protagonist accountable for all the terrible things he does. It's a shame that the original is so hard to go back to now, especially given just how well the series has evolved under Ubisoft's guidance.ĭid I ever tell you what the definition of 'insanity' is? With that simple question, demented pirate Vaas became one of the most memorable villains in video games due to his psychotic unpredictability as well as his eloquence. This all might sound ho-hum now, but back in 2004 it brought a new dimension to first-person shooters. Want to go into a mercenary camp quietly, hacking soldiers apart with your machete? That's viable, as is sniping enemies from afar, or rolling into the camp with a jeep, running over as many enemies as possible before the bullets fly. stunning but the openness of every level gave you plenty of tactical room to work with when you squared off against them.

Not only was the non-scripted, unpredictable enemy A.I. Essentially a sandbox version of Half-Life, Far Cry blew everyone's minds back in the day.

The first game focused on a soldier named Jack Carver as he searches for a journalist on a mysterious island filled with mercenaries and bloodthirsty mutants born from evil experiments. The original Far Cry game, developed by Crytek and published by Ubisoft, is radically different than what the series is today.

Far cry 3 blood dragon gameplay